PART S · Electric vehicle charging
Do new homes need electric car charge points
New homes with associated parking can require electric vehicle charge points under Part S. The required number follows the applicable rules and parking arrangement. It is not simply one charge point for every space regardless of the development.
What counts as associated parking
The relationship between the spaces and dwellings needs to be assessed under the guidance. Shared, allocated and separate parking arrangements can affect the design question.
Ask the designer to identify the relevant spaces on a schedule. A general statement that the site has parking does not explain which provisions apply.
Can cable routes replace charge points
Only where the applicable provision permits the particular arrangement. Part S distinguishes active charging from future cable-route provision, and specified cost-related or other exceptions need proper assessment.
Do not accept a spare conduit as equivalent to an operational charger without an explanation of the regulatory route.
What should the electrical design cover
The installation needs a suitable supply, protection, cable route and charging equipment. Shared parking may also need an operating arrangement that residents can understand.
For example, a charger located in a shared bay raises practical questions about access, use and responsibility. Resolve these alongside the required technical provision.
What should a buyer ask
Ask what equipment is included, whether it is operational, what access or service arrangements are needed and which certificates will be supplied. Confirm the location before the parking layout is finalised.
What records should be retained
Keep the scope assessment, any supported exception, electrical certification and relevant commissioning and maintenance information.
The appropriate standard depends on project dates and transitional arrangements as well as the finished building. If a seller says a new home does not require a charger, ask for the specific basis rather than assuming the omission proves a breach.